When the U.S. dropped the atomic bomb in Japan, do you think they deserved it? - japanese torture of women
I personally think he deserves the country, because both conqered makes hell. forcing them to use only speak Japanese, women raped, tortured and killed, or protest or speak a different language
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Japanese Torture Of Women When The U.S. Dropped The Atomic Bomb In Japan, Do You Think They Deserved It?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
First deserve "has nothing to do with it. The use of the atomic bomb was justified because:
- In early August, the Japanese refused to surrender to Potsdam.
- Who has repeatedly sent the message she has plan to fight until the end.
- Who started to all prisoners of war with the intention of all (kill kill eve 2-3-4-5 - election month was not so good if you integrate all the prisoners in the family want to).
- A land invasion from the results led to millions of deaths on both sides. For those who laugh at it, mind you, the small number of the Japanese army, once on the defensive after it was recorded between 98-100% (Okinawa, about 6,000 - in every country of the Pacific) to delivery. And remember: 1/4th of the population of Okinawa, committed suicide at the urging of the Japanese army (because they believed the lies, torture or rape, us), all civilians. An invasion of Japanese territory would have been terrible.
Secondly, it is estimated that the Japanese killed orAll 30 million people (mostly civilians, and) the vast majority of Asian countries. They conducted medical experiments that the plague (via balloon) in the United States approximately 200,000 women as comfort women "enslaved and between 37-45% of all prisoners of war died in camps sent cons (about 1% of deaths in the camps of the Allied German prisoners of war). The Japanese war on a scale of barbarism practiced. But you do not answer for everyone "deserves". Instead, c is to win the war, the administration of justice (which in this case, it would be arbitrary).
"He deserves" seems a bit too much. The problem is that the atomic bomb and not just a military, they aim to beat say two cities full of people - men, women, children, infants, the elderly - that has nothing going for most civilian war if their countries do. So many people were killed and wounded, nothing of the cruelty of Japanese soldiers were not practiced.
The argument for the use of the pump is that more lives, both U.S. and Japan would be lost if we are attacked, and Japan had fought in the traditional way that the land at the end of the war. I have no idea if that is true. But war is terrible and innocent people dying and suffering and lost people they love. Who deserves it?
Absolutely. The Japanese army killed nearly 40 million people. The son of FDR, not without provocation, has proposed that Japan has with the number of incoming been abandoned, as before the last invasion, if necessary. Japanese companies suggests a loss of 20 million U.S. dollars to the invasion of the mainland would be affordable and sustainable. The loss of approximately $ 2.5 million in general and not more than 200,000 and used the two atomic bombs (Tibbets third ready to go) was something of a godsend for them.
Absolutely. The Japanese army killed nearly 40 million people. The son of FDR, not without provocation, has proposed that Japan has with the number of incoming been abandoned, as before the last invasion, if necessary. Japanese companies suggests a loss of 20 million U.S. dollars to the invasion of the mainland would be affordable and sustainable. The loss of approximately $ 2.5 million in general and not more than 200,000 and used the two atomic bombs (Tibbets third ready to go) was something of a godsend for them.
I do not know whether someone "deserves" such a thing ... On the one hand is not the Japanese people to invade the decisions to other countries. It is the government, however, that the people who died, suffered terribly. Is it fair to punish the population of a country to which the decisions of the government?
I would not be punished for the decision of the U.S. Government!
The only reason why I think the bump was a good decision, because I really have no other options quickly end the war and have lower limits. The war had been so long in Europe and the Pacific continued, we had to stop and take the people back home. The United States has no choice but to use them.
Who does not know them properly, or to do the right (or moral or ethical), but in hindsight it is easier to assess if you have to make this decision.
For this reason, we should drop a nuclear bomb in Moscow because it was worse in the post-war Europe. (Rape, torture, and millions) of deaths
No, I do not agree. The atomic bomb in Japan, could end the war and have contributed to the life alternatives. But it is very immoral. And so it was used the first, last and only time a nuclear weapon as a weapon against people.
Salud!
I think not. Because of all the terrible things that no soldiers of the Japanese government, but ordinary people who were the innocent victims in Japan
It's not about reaching to the war with a minimum of American casualties, that until the end.
Yes, that's all true, and even a breach of the lowlands, most were
It describes and practices are similar to the conquering armies in the world. Lokk in Iraq for the U.S. --
Yes, I do what they deserved. Do not hit someone, then you're the greatest.
Post a Comment